TITLE VII Attorneys in New York City, New Jersey and Philadelphia

Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Manhattan | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in the Bronx | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Brooklyn | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Staten Island | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Queens | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in New York City | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Long Island City | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Maspeth | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Sunnyside | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Middle Village | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Woodside | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Ridgewood | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Astoria | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Jackson Heights | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in East Elmhurst | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Kings County | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in New York County | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Queens County | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Richmond County | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in New Jersey | Wrongful Termination Attorney in New Jersey | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Newark | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Jersey City | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Paterson | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Woodbridge | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Toms River | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Hamilton Township | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Clifton | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Trenton | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Camden | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Cherry Hill | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Passaic | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Old Bridge | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Bayonne | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Vineland | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in North Bergen | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Union | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Hoboken | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in West New York | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Perth Amboy | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in East Brunswick | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in West Orange | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Sayreville | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Hackensack | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Elizabeth | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Linden | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Atlantic City | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Long Branch | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Manalapan | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Rahway | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Bergenfield | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Paramus | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Point Pleasant Beach | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Weehawken | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Wildwood | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Livingston | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Edison | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Union City | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in East Orange | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in New Brunswick | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Pennsylvania | Wrongful Termination Attorney in New York City | Wrongful Termination in Pennsylvania | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Philadelphia | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Pittsburgh | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Allentown | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Erie | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Reading | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Upper Darby | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Scranton | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Bethlehem | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Bensalem | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Lancaster | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Lower Merion | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Abington | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Bristol | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Levittown | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Harrisburg | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Haverford | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Altoona | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in York | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in State College | Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Wilkes-Barre

TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964

WHAT IS TITLE VII?

Signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 2, 1964, the Civil Rights Act came on the heels of the assassination of beloved President John F. Kennedy. Amidst civil strife and racial tension, the United States stood at a cross roads, either be that shining light on a hill that President Thomas Jefferson promised, or descend into racially divided country that had ravaged the European continent for centuries. President Johnson carried on JFK’s legacy by signing the Civil Rights Act, which provided sweeping legal reform and prohibited discrimination in various areas of American life, most notably in housing,and employment.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provided protections for employees against discrimination in the workplace, both on the job and in the hiring process. Title VII further prevented retaliation for employees who participate in making complaints of discrimination in the workplace.

In order to process and litigate claims of discrimination, Title VII also authorized congress to create the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission (“EEOC”), which was a federal administrative agency tasked with being the governments right hand in the battle against employment discrimination.

Among the EEOC’s first cases were those of female flight attendants seeking protections under the new Title VII law from the blatant sexual harassment and gender discrimination that these women faced on the daily. Original provisions of Title VII including sex discrimination as a protected category and thus employees who experienced sex discrimination were allowed to bring claims under Title VII. Many saw this as a joke. The running gag was “Title VII is going to require the Playboy Club to give men the equal opportunity to don puff tails and silk ears, and work as one of its scantily clad waitress.” All jokes aside, that’s just what the law did.

Barbara Roads, the union leader for the flight attendants at the time, walked into the EEOC with another blonde stewardess and decided to file the first complaints with the EEOC. These women’s complaints were met with amusement. However, the women fought on, and complained of the ban on marriage, age discrimination and weight tests. The Airlines argued that businessmen would be discouraged to fly if the were forced to change their regulations, to which Martha Griffiths, one of only five female EEOC Directors famously stated, “What are you running, an airline or a whorehouse?” Through hard fought legal battles, the Stewardess won their case, providing teeth not only to Title VII, but to the newly established EEOC.


WHAT IS PROTECTED UNDER TITLE VII?

Title VII mirrors the language of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VII protects employees from being discriminated against on the basis of their race, color, national origin, ethnicity, sex, gender, sexual orientation, religion, creed, age, disability or pregnancy. While many states and cities have similar laws to Title VII, Title VII only applies to employers with over 15 employees. Title VII also applies to labor unions, employment agencies, and both Federal and State Governments.

Further, an employee cannot be denied any person because of his/her racial group or perceived racial group, his/her race-linked characteristics or because of his or her marriage to or association with someone of a particular race. These same protections are afforded to an individual’s sex, or perceived sexual orientation. Title VII is always moving forward to keep pace with the ever changing social norms; being ever vigilant to balance traditional American mores with the new, more liberal American disposition.


WHAT CAN YOU NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST?

An employer with over 15 employees cannot discriminate against an individual because of their race, color, national origin, ethnicity, sex, gender, sexual orientation, religion, creed, age, disability or pregnancy. Further, an employer cannot retaliate against an individual for participating in a protected activity. A protected activity includes making complaints of discrimination based on one of the above protected classes.

Discrimination is difficult to define, but generally means an individual is being treated differently (lesser) solely because they are a member of a protected class. For instance, if a company held a party and the boss gave everyone a red cup, however, they gave their Indian employee a blue cup with a hole in it, solely because she is Indian or a women, than that would most likely be actionable discrimination under Title VII.

Much ink has been spilled over exactly what counts as actionable discrimination. In many cases, actions that may seem discriminatory on the surface may be pure coincidence, and an employer may have a legitimate non-discriminatory reason for an adverse employment action. Further, many employers create policies that do not appear discriminatory on the surface, but become discriminatory on how they are applied.

The most common form of discrimination is an individual making discriminatory comments based on another individual being a member of a protected class. While all discrimination is equal, there are certain trigger words that almost automatically trigger Title VII protections. Racial slurs, for instance, are usually a sure fire example of discriminatory conduct, with many Courts ruling that even one instance of the “N-word” is discriminatory.


WHAT IS THE SCOPE COVERAGE OF TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964?

Title VII is much larger in scope than typical discrimination. Under Title VII, sexual harassment is a form of discrimination. Sexual harassment in the workplace, pornography on a work site, sexual joking, sexual comments, etc. are actionable forms of sexual harassment.

Many times, sexual harassment comes in the forms of unwanted request for sex. This creates two basic forms of sexual harassment, quid pro quo and hostile work environment. Quid Pro Quo sexual harassment is basically when an employer promises to give an employee certain employment benefits based on that employee performing sexual favors for that employer. Hostile work environment sexual harassment is basically an employer creating an environment that a reasonable person would feel the is hostile based on sex, which often comes in the form of sexual joking or repeated requests for sexual favors.

Title VII is broad, but not as far reaching as most would hope. However, it does protect a wide range of activities, activities that most would not think of as particularly discriminatory or harassing. For instance, in the case of sexual harassment, because many individuals agree to perform the sexual acts, they don’t feel as though their claim is actionable. This is a common misconception. If the only reason you performed the sexual act is because a co-worker or supervisor asked you to perform that act, even far away from the work place, then you may have an actionable claim for workplace sexual harassment, and thus sex based discrimination under Title VII.


HOW DO EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY LAWS PROTECT JOB APPLICANTS?

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 not only covers individuals who already have a job, but also protects individuals in the hiring and recruiting process. Title VII further covers individuals in the application and interview process. Often interviewers will ask questions which are thinly veiled attempt to suss out information that may be damning to the applicant, such as revealing a pregnancy or sexual orientation. Make no mistake, Title VII covers employers who attempt to keep individuals out of their company because those individuals are members of a protected class.


The skilled New York City sexual harassment attorneys at the Derek Smith Law Group, PLLC, have years of experience litigating claims of discrimination under Title VII. Working together with our Philadelphia sexual harassment attorneys, we have recovered millions for our clients based on Title VII claims. If you feel you have been discriminated against based on your protected class, please give our talented attorneys a call, toll free, at 1877 4NYLAWS, for your free consultation.

 

 TITLE VII| Employment Discrimination Attorneys serving New York, New Jersey & Philadelphia 

New York Office
1 Pennsylvania Plaza, 49th fl.
New York City, NY 10119
Phone: 877-469-5297
Fax: 212-587-4169
Click for street directions »
Philadelphia, PA Office
1845 Walnut Street,
Suite 1600
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Phone: 215-391-4790
Click for street directions »
New Jersey Office | Hewitt
73 Forest Lake Drive
Hewitt, NJ 07421
Phone: 800-807-2209
Fax: 212-587-4169
Click for street directions »
Free Consultation with a New York City, New Jersey and Philadelphia Employment Discrimination and Sexual Harassment Lawyer 

Our Wrongful Termination Attorneys offer a Free Consultation & we charge No Fee Unless We Recover For You