Planes, trains and gender discrimination
HUNTINGTON, W.V. – CSX Transportation, Inc., a leading provider of transportation services, is currently facing a massive gender discrimination suit alleging the transportation giant discriminated against its female employees throughout the eastern half of the United States. According to the suit, CSX employed “strength tests” as part of the application process for certain position at CSX, such as conductor or material handler. As it turns out, these strength tests had a disparate impact on female employees, with many females failing to qualify for the positions based on strength and not ability to perform he job.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) has filed suit against CSX on behalf of CSX’s female employees. Since at least 2008, CSX has used isokinetic strength tests known as IPCS Biodex. These tests purport to measure upper and lower body muscle strength. The EEOC argues that the females who have taken the test pass at significantly lower rates when compared to their male counterparts. Further, CSX used two other employment test, on to measure aerobic capacity and one testing arm endurance, which females passed at significantly lower rates than their male counterparts also.
The EEOC complaint states that CSX declined to hire an entire class of women workers for jobs because they failed these tests, allowing the company to discriminate against women because of their sex. Such conduct is prohibited under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits sex based discrimination. Title VII protects individuals, not only from discrimination while one is on the job, but also discrimination in hiring, firing and promotion. Title VII doesn’t exactly prohibit employment practices such as CSX’s tests, however, if those tests have the effect of discriminating against on individual based on their sex, then an individual may make claim of employment discrimination.
Under Title VII, when a company uses tests that are discriminatory as applied, then the employer must prove that those practices are necessary for safe and efficient performance of the specific jobs for which the tests are used. However, even if the company can prove that the tests are necessary, they must also prove that there is not an alternative test that could achieve the desired objective but have a less discriminatory affect.
Rob Doolittle, a spokesmen for CSX, released a statement reiterating that CSX is committed to following its obligations under the law and will defend any allegations of discrimination. Doolittle wants to make it clear that CSX has no desire to discriminate against its female employees and upholds that these tests are necessary, and a part of CSX’s commitment to safety.
The EEOC has filed their suit in the Southern District of West Virginia after attempting pre-litigation settlement through the proper channels. They are seeking injunctive relief, to prohibit further discriminatory practices, along with compulsive hiring and monetary damages for the loss wages of its female employees. This type of discrimination is not only prohibited under Federal law, but also various state laws.
The New York City Human Rights Law along with the New York State Human Rights Law, also prohibit discrimination based on gender or sex. The skilled New York City sexual harassment attorneys at the Derek Smith law Group, PLLC, have years of experience bringing claims of gender discrimination on behalf of our clients. Working closely with our Philadelphia sexual harassment attorneys, we have recovered millions on behalf of our clients who were discriminated against because of their sex. If you feel you have been discriminated against because of your sex, please give our talented attorneys a call, toll free, at (800) 807-2209.
Call today to schedule a FREE sexual harassment or employment discrimination legal Consultation in NY, NJ & PA with one of our top rated employment law or sexual harassment attorneys here at the Derek Smith Law Group. You can reach us online or by calling . Our New York City, New Jersey and Philadelphia labor & employment law attorneys handle a variety of cases involving sexual harassment, racial discrimination, pregnancy discrimination, and other employment-related claims. We serve clients throughout New York, including Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, and Staten Island. We also have offices in New Jersey and Philadelphia to serve you.
Make Sure Your Lawyers Have the Verdicts To Back Up Their Negotiations – Results Matter!
- $4.025 Million Jury Verdict Awarded in Employment Discrimination Case
- $2.5 million jury verdict awarded to sexual harassment victim
- $2.2 Million Jury Verdict Awarded to Race Discrimination Victim Against Well Known Glassware Company
- $1.6 Million Jury Verdict Awarded to Sexual Orientation and Religious Discrimination Victim
- Largest NY Verdict In Employment Law for 2012.
- George Floyd’s Death Opens Communications About Race at Work - June 19, 2020
- Is Your Employer Using Coronavirus Firings to Discriminate? - April 9, 2020
- “Uber Black” Drivers May Be Entitled to Millions in Unpaid Employee Wages - April 7, 2020
- Employee Rights When Laid Off Due to Coronavirus - April 2, 2020
- Healthcare Workers’ Rights When Fired or Forced to Quit for Objecting to Work Conditions While Treating Coronavirus Patients - April 1, 2020
- How Can I Get Paid When I Can’t Work Due to Coronavirus? - March 30, 2020
- What the Families First Coronavirus Response Act Does for Employees Who Need Paid Leave? - March 20, 2020
- Employee Rights During the Coronavirus Outbreak: What U.S. Employees Need to Know - March 14, 2020
- The Coronavirus Spreads Racism and Anti-Chinese Sentiment - March 3, 2020
- Are You Entitled to Paid Maternity Leave? - January 23, 2020