Pennsylvania Comes Down Hard on Accused Teacher
Bucks County, PA – The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court has ruled that an arbitration award that would have allowed a male teacher to be reinstated after being accused of making repeated sexually explicit comments toward a female co-worker violated the public policy against sexual harassment and cannot be enforced.
On September 18, 2017, the panel in Neshaminy School District v. Neshaminy Federation of Teachers found that the teacher’s 20-day suspension was too light and may send the wrong message to students. Specifically, the panel decided that not dismissing him from his job as a ninth-grade teacher posed an unacceptable risk in the classroom and demonstrated a tolerance for sexual harassment.
The male teacher involved in the action, Jared Katz, was a teacher at Neshaminy School District a large suburban public school district located in Bucks County, Pennsylvania.
Initially, the arbitrator issued an award that reinstated Katz after a 20-day suspension and authorized the school district to require him to undergo reasonable sexual harassment training. The school district filed a petition to vacate the award because of the “unacceptable risk of undermining the clear anti-sexual harassment policy” of the district and in Pennsylvania.
The court agreed with the school in the end. Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer wrote Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court’s 5-2 majority opinion stating, “There is not a ‘reasonable, calibrated, defensible relationship between’ Katz’s continuous, hostile, offensive and deleterious conduct ‘violating dominant public policy and the arbitrator’s response’ to reinstate Katz to the classroom, even with the condition that the district could require him to attend reasonable sexual harassment training after his reinstatement.”
In determining whether the matter fell under the public policy, the court factored whether the nature of the conduct was identified (“pervasive sexual harassment”), whether the conduct implicated a “well-defined and dominant public policy,” and whether the award posed an unacceptable risk of undermining the public policy.
Another teacher in the Neshaminy School District provided testimony as a witness of the Katz’s sexual harassment, explaining that Katz directed sarcastic and sexually explicit comments toward the woman “all day, every day.” Such comments included inviting her to sit in his lap, telling her it took all his self-control not to kiss her and responding to a sexually inappropriate comment when she asked him to stop. Moreover, the witness stated that students were starting to comment about a possible relationship between the two teachers.
The court believed that such sexual harassment and comments could not only distract students from their education but could also warp their understanding of permissible conduct and make them believe Katz’s “continuous” harassment was normal.
If you feel you have suffered sexual harassment on the job or your college campus contact one of our Philadelphia sexual harassment attorneys at the Derek Smith Law Group, PLLC today for a free consultation. Our attorneys have years of experience litigating claims of gender discrimination. Working together with our New York City sexual harassment attorneys, we have recovered millions on behalf of our clients. If you feel you have been discriminated against because of your gender, please give our attorneys a call at (800) 807-2209 for a free consultation.
Call today to schedule a FREE sexual harassment or employment discrimination legal Consultation in NY, NJ & PA with one of our top rated employment law or sexual harassment attorneys here at the Derek Smith Law Group. You can reach us online or by calling . Our New York City, New Jersey and Philadelphia labor & employment law attorneys handle a variety of cases involving sexual harassment, racial discrimination, pregnancy discrimination, and other employment-related claims. We serve clients throughout New York, including Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, and Staten Island. We also have offices in New Jersey and Philadelphia to serve you.
Make Sure Your Lawyers Have the Verdicts To Back Up Their Negotiations – Results Matter!
- $4.025 Million Jury Verdict Awarded in Employment Discrimination Case
- $2.5 million jury verdict awarded to sexual harassment victim
- $2.2 Million Jury Verdict Awarded to Race Discrimination Victim Against Well Known Glassware Company
- $1.6 Million Jury Verdict Awarded to Sexual Orientation and Religious Discrimination Victim
- Largest NY Verdict In Employment Law for 2012.
- Are You Entitled to Paid Maternity Leave? - January 23, 2020
- Do Nooses, KKK comments, & Confederate Flags Show Racism in Ohio UPS? - March 14, 2019
- Not So Cushy For Cushman & Wakefield - October 22, 2018
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination After Zarda - October 22, 2018
- Discrimination in Places of Public Accommodation: Are You Protected? - October 22, 2018
- Did Kavanaugh Commit Perjury? - October 2, 2018
- Kavanaugh: Rush to judgement… Again? - September 20, 2018
- Is Serena Williams right to claim sexism? - September 13, 2018
- THE “NEED-TO-KNOW” ON NEW YORK’S NEW SEXUAL HARASSMENT LAWS - August 28, 2018
- EEOC Lawsuit Charging United Airlines with Sexual Harassment and Hostile Work Environment - August 22, 2018